扁案的風風雨雨
楊醫師緒東兄來信; 題 Former Taiwan President Chen needs your help! 並附上阿扁手寫信件。
不客氣說;
(1) 喊救扁或挺扁的人很多, 可是 沒有合理有效行動。
(2) 紅藍臥底也奏上熱鬧, 不放棄統戰技巧, 挑撥離間, 用扁議題將台灣人分成兩群; 挺扁和反扁的抗爭。早分化李團及陳隊, 自不待言, 也是受綠營支持的中國人論客成就。台灣人苦命。
(3) 臥底也難有 [完全犯罪的技巧], 必定有破綻; 台北有兩組 [建國], 即用 [建國當幌子], 都不是正港台灣人的在台中國人, 一組挺扁, 另一組反扁, 兩組未曾對立才是妙處; 我早就明言兩者都是臥底, 可是兩者各擁有不少綠營支持者, 頗受綠營轉送轉貼他們的謬論而沾沾自喜。
(4) 臥底特徵是專鬧茶壺中風暴; 不做体制外運動, 不做海外告洋狀或出洋相工作; 因中國最怕 [台灣問題國際化] 。胡錦濤指令他們消滅海外烽火。
(5) 扁案的國際化只有兩個團隊正在進行;
(a) 林志昇團隊早在2009年8月13日訴狀送進美國最高法院,
(b) TCRLO (護台灣人權訴訟組織) 也經由林志昇管道, 取得適當文獻, 以救扁為主軸進行 [提訴] 的行動。
(6) 扁案核心在 ROC in Exile 違犯了 [Due Process of Law 法律正] 的人權案。鬧其他的芝麻小事者, 正中臥底統戰的暗箭, 或64年洗腦教育的中毒。
(7) 若有第三組人士, 超越喊口號的領域者, 盼望跟 (a) 和 (b) 的組織互動為盼。我們不善[政治運作], 默默推動 [法理建國], 努力脫離64年來的 [政治煉獄] 。
(8) 自228事件, 228屠殺, 台灣大屠殺, 嚇勒苦死特Holocausts, 進一步釋議完成The 228 Ethnic Cleansing 種族屠滅的論述, 加上2006年開始準備的TCRLO組織依美國法律完成，不僅替20萬柱228台灣神各各討回公道, 100萬家族蒙受相等痛苦也討回公道, 更延伸打擊ROC, KMT的64年來的惡魔政策, 挖光台灣人財產及其所作所為, 一一曝光, 一一繩之以法, 一一提訴, 一一伏法。
(9) TCRLO的追蹤The 228 Ethnic Cleansing的法律訴訟, 不僅是 [私案] 而擴張到 [整個台灣民族死活問題] ; 並徵求同志來共同努力。We have SF organization, and going to have New York organization soon! We do things bylaw! [種族屠滅] 的一面是殺人, 搶掠, 貪污... 其反面是赤腳吃丐搖身變了世界最富裕的不義之財; 中國國民党的血鮮党產。
如果, 您明大義, 不吃ROC in Exile的Ethnic Cleansing 種族屠滅的戰爭犯罪行為, 向[日本駐台大使, 齊藤正樹先生發列信件, 請他施[國際壓力], 阻止ROC in Exile的法院做出離譜笑話。有一點壓力就算一點, 比不做好!
陳辰光
2009-09-06
E-mail: saito@mail.japan-taipei.org.tw,
Dear Honorable Chairman Saito:
The Japanese Governor-General of Formosa was modeled on the Office of French Overseas Territory. However, with the fixation on British Hong Kong and Taiwan, the British yardstick is more appropriate for comparisons with Taiwan under USMG. In the pre-1997 case of a Crown Colony, Hong Kong was not a British Dominion. After the 1867 Constitution Act, a colonial form of government in British North America created the prime minister and parliament who exercised real political power under the Governor-General. After 1945, the Dominion of Canada gained international legal personality but remained a legal creature of Crown administrative authority. The Canadian Governor-General does retain the right to an emergency exercise of "reserve powers".
The ROC President is the equivalent of the Prime Minister but USMG has kept a right to exercise of emergency powers under TRA and SFPT. In American Sector of Berlin, the US Ambassador to West German was also the US High Commissioner for Berlin. Those reserve powers were exercised in 1979 for US v Tiede. Roger Lin has sworn affidavits from former ROC President Chen that the AIT Chairman has acted in a manner consistent with a High Commissioner for Taiwan under SFPT. Any exiled government is the foreign policy instrument of the sponsoring government who recognized it; especially if sponsored by any hegemonic powers of geopolitics. Is the AIT Chairman the "unofficial" High Commissioner of Taiwan? Under the old Stimson policy of non-recognition, the Japanese puppet-state of Manchukuo (Manchuria) could not relieve Imperial Japan from the criminal acts of the proxy occupation of ROC Chinese territory after 1931. FM 27-10 Laws of Land Warfare states:
366. Local Governments under Duress and Puppet Governments
The restrictions placed upon the authority of a belligerent government cannot be avoided by a system of using a puppet government, central or local, to carry out acts which would be unlawful if performed directly by the occupant. Acts induced or compelled by the occupant are nonetheless its acts.
The 2-28 Incident was unlawfully committed by ROC Chinese co-belligerents of the USMG principle occupational authority of Japan and its territorial dependencies. The putative ROC on Taiwan cannot avoid their responsibilities under a system of puppet government under a USMG-Taiwan system of government-in- exile on Taiwan. Under SFPT, Japan cannot bring the KMT to justice but the terms of surrender by Japan do allow for it to protest the USMG system of proxy occupation of Formosa. "Nonrecognition" does not relieve USMG under a system of nonhostile relations between belligerents and co-belligerents in the absence of a diplomatic relationship.
See Par. 247 Definition of Protect Persons:
Persons protected by the Convention are those who, at a given moment and in any manner whatsoever, find themselves, in case of a conflict or occupation, in the hands of a Party to the conflict or Occupying Power of which they are not nationals.
Nationals of a State which is not bound by the Convention are not protected by it. Nationals of a neutral State, who find themselves in the territory of a belligerent State, and nationals of a co-belligerent State, shall not be regarded as protected persons while the State of which they are nationals has normal diplomatic representation in the State in whose hands they are.
The Occupying Power is USMG. The unlawful acts of the ROC on Taiwan are the acts of the Occupying Power unless redress is instituted by it against recognized co-belligerent insurgents under Laws of War. Ma Ying-jeou is a ROC national but Chen Shui-bian is not.
While not a Japanese national, Chen is a protected person under Law of Occupation for SFPT. The system of dual courts was used by the USMG in Okinawa under SFPT Art. 3.
The US refuses to utilize the system of military commissions to redress the crimes of the KMT committed against (former) Japanese nationals of Formosa after 1947. The USMG has reserved the right for emergency powers of judicial administrative authority in SFPT. This current situation shocks the conscience and public interest demands an exercise of redress in Art 4(a) & (b) of SFPT.
Please use your good offices to press for the redress of the 2-28 Incident war crimes by the Occupying Power in SFPT. The KMT era of White Terror has never been addressed by the USA.
Very Respectfully,
Jeff Geer
CFO
Taiwan Civil Rights Litigation Organization
This open private correspondence is protected under redress safe harbor of the Logan Act (18 USC 953).
............................................................................................................
參考: 謝鎮寬兄己有漢字版供參考; 請鼓勵親朋好友也送信為幸;
尊敬的齋藤大使：
日本駐台總督是模仿法屬海外領地的辦公室。然而，隨著英屬香港的落幕，以英國尺度來衡量台灣，遠不如用美國軍事政府台灣詮釋來得貼切。一九七七年以前的皇家殖民地案例，香港不是英國的自治領。在一八六七年的憲法法案後，殖民地式政府成形，在英屬北美創造了總理和自治領議會，在總督的監管下實際執行政治權力。一九四五年後，加拿大自治領獲得國際法人資格，但仍屬於皇家管理權下合法產物。加拿大總督對緊急重大事件仍然擁有“保留權力”。
中華民國總統是相當於總理，而美國軍事政府根據台灣關係法及舊金山和約，一直保留行使緊急權力。在柏林的美國部門，美國駐西德大使，也就是美國駐柏林的高級委員。這些保留的權力，在一九七九年美國訴泰迪時執行。林志昇先生已取得中華民國前任總統陳水扁的供詞，指認美國在台協會主席，確實扮演舊金山和約授權下的高級委員。任何流亡政府都是其受贊助政府的外交政策工具，尤其是如果贊助者是任何地緣政治的霸權國。美國在台協會主席是台灣的“非官方”高級委員嗎？根據史汀生〝不承認〞政策，日本傀儡滿洲國，不能免除日本帝國在一九三一年後，代理佔領中華民國領土的犯罪行為。
美國陸軍野戰手冊27-10法規的規定：
第366節。地方政府在脅迫下的偽政府：
對交戰國政府權力的限制，無可避免地使用一個中央或地方傀儡政權，來進行活動，它如果是由佔領者來直接執行，則屬於非法行為。由佔領者的誘導或強迫行為，仍然是違法行為。
二二八事件，是由日本及其屬地的主要佔領權者，美國軍事政府的共同交戰國，中華民國中國人所犯下的罪行。中華民國在台灣的準國家政府，中華民國流亡政權，是無法藉口因係在美國軍事政府下的傀儡政府，來逃避責任。根據舊金山和約，日本不能將國民黨繩之以法，但關鍵是日本投降，是允許她向美國軍事政府抗議，指控其在台灣的佔領代理。 “不承認主義”並不免除美國軍事政府，因交戰國與共同交戰國之間已無敵意，無邦交關係，來逃避其責任。
參閱247節，保護人員的定義：
公約所保障的人是那些，在特定的時刻，任何方式，在案件衝突時，發現自己是在被佔領者或衝突者的手中，而他們是“非國民”。
一個不受該公約約束的國民是不受保護。一個中立國家的國民，發現自己處在交戰國境內，及交戰國國民，都不被視為受保護的人，因這些國民的國家，他們有正常的外交代表，由他們經手在該國來加以保護。
佔領權國是美國軍事政府。中華民國在台灣的非法行為，當歸咎於主要佔領權國，除非他依據戰爭法，對已被認定叛軍的共同交戰國提起追訴，來作為補救。馬英九是中華民國國民，但陳水扁不是。
雖然不是日本國民，陳水扁是一個，根據舊金山和約佔領法下的被保護人。雙軌法院系統，依據舊金山和約第三節，曾被美國軍事政府在沖繩採用。
美國拒絕應用該系統的軍事委員會，來糾正一九四七年後國民黨，對（原）日本國民所犯的罪行。但美國軍事政府保留，舊金山和約下司法管轄的緊急權。目前的狀況衝擊了良知和公眾利益，因而要求依據舊金山和約第四節（a）及（b）款，給予補救。
請使用您的權宜斡旋，向舊金山和約的主要佔領權國，爭取糾正二二八事件的戰犯罪行。國民黨時代的白色恐怖，美國到現在還沒有處理。
謹此，
葛傑夫 : 首席財務長: 台灣民權訴訟組織
此公開私人信函受到羅根法案（18卷953）平反安全庇護的保障。
.............................................................................................................................
台灣人沒有自己的媒体, 多轉送, 多轉貼
並感覺 驕傲, 光榮是愛台灣的第一步。
陳辰光 謹上 2009-09-06
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: The above content is a reply e-mail message from 陳辰光 to Dr. Yang.
In return, Dr. Yang said
Dear sir/madam
